How do scoring criteria typically vary between the written exam and physical agility tests?

Scoring criteria generally differ between the written exam and physical agility tests due to the nature of what each test assesses. Written exams often utilize a raw scoring system that is converted into a grading scale, reflecting a range of performance levels that can be used to differentiate candidates based on their knowledge and understanding. This allows for a nuanced evaluation of their test-taking abilities, as it can reflect various levels of knowledge and comprehension.

In contrast, physical agility tests are typically structured around pass/fail benchmarks. These benchmarks are designed to ensure that candidates meet a minimum standard of physical fitness necessary for the job, without the added complexity of grading on a scale. This binary approach simplifies the scoring process, focusing instead on whether candidates can perform essential physical tasks required for firefighting or police work.

This distinction in scoring criteria is crucial as it aligns with the differing objectives of each exam type: written tests evaluate cognitive skills while physical tests assess physical capability. The approach taken in scoring also ensures that each candidate is assessed fairly in relation to the specific skills required for their prospective roles.